The Role of Government Policies in Accelerating Clean Heavy-Duty Vehicle Adoption

The urgency to combat climate change and reduce air pollution has propelled the transportation sector into the spotlight, particularly the heavy-duty vehicle (HDV) segment, which constitutes a major share of greenhouse gas emissions and exhaust pollutants. The transportation sector accounts for about 29% of total GHG emissions in the United States, with HDVs specifically contributing nearly 24%. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), HDVs represented around 5% of the global vehicle population but were responsible for almost 40% of road transport CO2 emissions in 2021. To address these environmental impacts, various governments have implemented policies within the transport sector aimed at enhancing the environmental and energy efficiency of vehicles and fuels. Clean heavy-duty vehicles utilise alternative fuels such as electricity or hydrogen, exhibit lower emissions than conventional diesel trucks, and employ advanced technologies to minimise environmental impacts. Transitioning to these vehicles is vital for achieving climate goals and improving air quality in urban areas where freight traffic is dense.

Governments play an essential role by implementing targeted policies to accelerate the transition to cleaner freight transport. Governmental policies serve as a framework within which market forces operate. In the context of clean HDV adoption, they can shift the economic balance in favour of cleaner technologies, promote innovation, and stimulate infrastructure development, which is essential for broader implementation. A report from ResearchAndMarkets indicates that the electric commercial vehicle market, including HDVs, will grow at a CAGR of 25% from 2021 to 2030, propelled by increasing demand for sustainable transport solutions. The effectiveness of these policies varies based on their design and integration into broader transportation and environmental strategies.

  1. Subsidies

Subsidies are financial incentives the government provides to reduce the cost burden of purchasing clean HDVs. They can take various forms, including direct cash rebates for buyers, tax credits, and grants for research and development. For instance:

  • Direct Purchase Subsidies: These can lower the upfront cost of clean HDVs, making them more affordable for trucking companies. Programs in countries like the United States and various European nations have successfully boosted sales of electric and hydrogen-powered trucks through substantial rebate programs.
  • Infrastructure Development Subsidies: Governments can subsidise the development of refuelling and recharging infrastructure, which remains a barrier to wide-scale acceptance. Investment in charging stations or hydrogen refuelling sites supports current clean HDV owners and alleviates range anxiety for potential consumers.
  1. Incentives

Incentives are indirect mechanisms to encourage the adoption of clean HDVs, often by offering benefits that complement a purchase decision. These can include:

  • Tax Incentives: Tax deductions or credits for clean vehicle purchases encourage businesses to invest in environmentally friendly fleets. Programs such as these can accelerate the payback period for investments in new technology.
  • Access to Exclusive Lanes: Clean HDVs often receive preferential access to urban centres or low-emission zones. Such policies enhance the operational efficiency and cost-effectiveness of clean fleets by circumventing congestion charges or enabling entry into otherwise restricted areas.
  • Lower Registration Fees: Reduced vehicle registration fees can be an attractive incentive for companies considering the transition to clean technologies.
  1. Regulations

Regulatory measures are very important in setting the foundational standards that encourage cleaner technologies. They create a compliance environment that obligates manufacturers and fleet operators to adopt cleaner practices:

  • Emissions Standards: Implementing stringent emissions regulations mandates that new trucks meet specific environmental criteria. These regulations often drive manufacturers to innovate and produce cleaner vehicles to meet compliance demands.
  • Fleet Regulations: Laws requiring a certain percentage of fleet vehicles to be low-emission or electric can stimulate demand for clean HDVs. For example, California’s Advanced Clean Trucks regulation requires that a growing proportion of HDVs sold in the state be zero-emission.
  • Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) Standards: These regulations can be adapted to include heavy-duty vehicles, compelling manufacturers to produce more fuel-efficient and less polluting models.
  • Mandates for Clean Technologies: Governments can mandate clean technologies in HDVs, such as electric or hydrogen fuel cell powertrains. These mandates can accelerate the transition to cleaner freight transport by ensuring new HDVs are equipped with the latest clean technologies.

Several countries have successfully implemented policies to accelerate the adoption of clean HDVs. For example, the United States offers tax credits for the purchase of electric HDVs, while the European Union has set stringent emissions standards for HDVs. These policies have led to significant increases in adopting clean HDVs and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. California has led the way in advocating for clean trucks through regulations. The Advanced Clean Trucks Regulation, implemented in 2020, sets ambitious sales targets for zero-emission vehicles. By 2035, the regulation requires 100% of new medium- and heavy-duty vehicles sold in the state to be zero-emission. The California Air Resources Board (CARB) has estimated that these policies could eliminate approximately 25 million metric tons of greenhouse gases and create jobs in manufacturing and services. Likewise, Germany has implemented multiple policies to support clean HDVs, including the National Innovation Program for Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technology (NIP), which has committed over €350 million in funding to research and develop clean technologies by 2026. The German government also introduced a cash rebate program to purchase zero-emission trucks and provides funding for charging stations, intending to establish a nationwide network of hydrogen refuelling stations. China has emerged as the world’s largest market for electric vehicles, including HDVs. The government has invested heavily in subsidies and incentives, with some provinces offering rebates of up to $20,000 for electric trucks. The New Energy Vehicle (NEV) mandate requires manufacturers to produce a certain percentage of new energy vehicles, and cities like Beijing have set ambitious targets for replacing diesel-fueled trucks with electric versions.

In conclusion, government policies are vital in accelerating the adoption of clean HDVs. Subsidies, incentives, and regulations can reduce businesses’ financial burden, provide additional benefits, and set standards for using clean technologies. By implementing these policies, governments can catalyse the transition to cleaner freight transport and contribute to a more sustainable future.

References

Askin, A. C., Barter, G. E., West, T. H., & Manley, D. K. (2015). The heavy-duty vehicle future in the United States: A parametric analysis of technology and policy tradeoffs. Energy Policy, 81, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.02.005

Bae, Y., Mitra, S. K., Rindt, C. R., & Ritchie, S. G. (2022). Factors influencing alternative fuel adoption decisions in heavy-duty vehicle fleets. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 102, 103150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103150

Bose Styczynski, A., & Hughes, L. (2019). Public policy strategies for next-generation vehicle technologies: An overview of leading markets. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.09.002

Chowdhury, V., Farzana Mehzabin Tuli, & Suman Kumar Mitra. (2024). Sustainable Shift: Analyzing Drivers for Low-Carbon Transportation Adoption in California’s Heavy-Duty and Off-Road Sectors. Sustainability, 16(5), 1722–1722. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16051722

Fleming, K. L., Brown, A. L., Fulton, L., & Miller, M. (2021). Electrification of Medium- and Heavy-Duty Ground Transportation: Status Report. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 8(3), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40518-021-00187-3

Lane, B., Kinnon, M. M., Shaffer, B., & Samuelsen, S. (2022). Deployment planning tool for environmentally sensitive heavy-duty vehicles and fueling infrastructure. Energy Policy, 171, 113289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113289

Miller, J., & Façanha, C. (2015). THE STATE OF CLEAN TRANSPORT POLICY A 2014 SYNTHESIS OF VEHICLE AND FUEL POLICY DEVELOPMENTS. https://theicct.org/sites/default/files/publications/ICCT_StateOfCleanTransportPolicy_2014.pdf

Stryhunivska, O., Zwolińska, B., & Giel, R. (2024). The Management of Harmful Emissions from Heavy-Duty Transport Towards Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(24), 10988. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162410988

Teng, F., Zhang, Q., Chen, S., Wang, G., Huang, Z., & Wang, L. (2024). Comprehensive effects of policy mixes on the diffusion of heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell electric trucks in China considering technology learning. Energy Policy, 185, 113961–113961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113961

Wiginton, L., Smith, C., Ewing, M., & Battista, G. (2019). Fuel savings and emissions reductions in heavy-duty trucking A blueprint for further action in Canada. https://www.metcalffoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/FreightClimateBlueprints_April-2019.pdf Zhu, M., Dong, P., Ju, Y., Li, J., & Ran, L. (2023). Effects of government subsidies on heavy-duty hydrogen fuel cell truck penetration: A scenario-based system dynamics model. Energy Policy, 183, 113809–113809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113809

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *